Explosives Expert Legal Consulting

If your law firm has taken on a case that involves explosives, propellants, pyrotechnics, ordnance, or fireworks, Bob Morhard can help you navigate the technical issues and provide explosives expert legal consulting. Explosives expert consulting is a niche field that requires specific training and experience in order to provide reliable testimony and legal consulting. ExploConsult can offer that reliability, accuracy, and efficiency.

Bob Morhard Simplify's Complex Technical Matters For Attorney's That Are Understandable by Jury's

ExploConsult is operated by Bob Morhard who has more than 51 years of experience working with explosive subject matter. Mr. Morhard has extensive U.S. military technical training and provides explosive expert consulting for various projects including:

  • Accident investigation
  • Forensic accident investigation
  • Product liability issues
  • Forensic environmental issues
  • Product development and formulation
  • Explosive disposal
  • Raw materials approvals
  • Procedure development
  • Risk management
  • Explosives use and application
  • Insurance underwriting

Mr. Morhard has had technical experiences over the past 50 years in explosives, detonator, propellants, ordnance, and pyrotechnics. This experience extends to all areas of formulation, safety, production, processing, management and storage, blasting application, manufacturing, handling, and disposal.

He is experienced in planning, designing, and managing the construction and startup of manufacturing facilities in 112 countries worldwide within more than 755 explosives, propellant, detonator, and pyrotechnic manufacturing plants.

To research more about Mr. Morhard’s extensive experience and expertise working with explosives, check out our qualifications page.

Explosives Expert Support

ExploConsult provides Explosive Expert support to attorneys with insight on initial civil or criminal case evaluation, developing discovery requests, interrogatories, and deposition questions involving incidents or accidents related to explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics material.

Attorneys are extremely busy, often managing many cases simultaneously and require reliable insight into legal strategies and causation. Bob Morhard communicates clearly and quickly with attorneys to define Duty of Care and Standard of Care in cases involving explosives materials, and to evaluate circumstances and the law.

Defining the Duty of Care and Standard of Care elements for explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics material, fireworks, ordnance, and devices requires subject matter expertise. Duty of Care and Standard of Care requirements for any explosive’s material vary, as what a reasonably careful, prudent person or organization would do in the same or similar circumstances with any explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics materials. Bob Morhard performs an in-depth examination of the facts, to provide a But-For assessment and an opinion on Predictability and Foreseeability and Causation described in objective, understandable, cogent and quantitively empirical terms.

Bob Morhard uses forensic tools and procedures and clearly communicates with attorneys on incidents or accidents related to energetic materials such as explosive, propellant, pyrotechnic materials, devices, fireworks, ammunition, or ordnance. Bob Morhard provides reliable, cogent, and concise information to assist attorneys in the development of legal strategies.

​The initial assessment in any case involving explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics material is to define Duty of Care and Standard of Care, and to evaluate the circumstances presented and the law. Duty of Care and Standard of Care are the requirements of what a reasonably careful, prudent person or organization would do in the same or similar circumstances with explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics materials.

Incidents, accidents, or criminal actions related to explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics material have subtle but crucial clues that must be identified. This involves the process of reconstructing a single, unique past event that is no longer observable and examining all the facts that led to a But-For assessment and formulate an explosive’s expert opinion on Predictability and Foreseeability and Causation.

Forensic Tools and Procedures

This involves the process of reconstructing a single, unique past event that is no longer observable. ExploConsult explosives expert professional services include these forensic tools to assess and opine on incidents or accidents related to energetic materials such as explosive, propellant, pyrotechnic materials, devices, fireworks, ammunition, or ordnance:

  • Analyzing the evidence and the scene
  • Accident reconstruction
  • Hazardous materials constituents in the substance or article
  • Laws, statues, regulations, permits, guidance assessment
  • Design, ignition, initiation, and related technology assessment
  • Explosive’s materials physical and chemical analysis
  • Hazardous materials audit UN Manual of Tests and Criteria
  • Logistics audit US DOT and foreign codes, truck, rail, and ship
  • Explosive’s article and inert exemplar testing
  • Compliance audit and compendium US, State, and municipal law
  • Compliance audit and compendium NATO, and foreign government law
  • Compliance audit and compendium for US Department of Defense regulations
  • Process safety management, quantitative risk assessment
  • Hazardous material constituent factors, design factors, formulation assessment
  • Blood spatter assessment
  • Injury pathology assessment
  • Structural and materials assessment
  • Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and X ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  • Infrared spectroscopy and mass spectroscopy
  • Assessing the explosives materials involved and the donor/receptor relationships
  • Deflagration to detonation transition assessment
  • Fragmentation zone and crater analysis
  • Fragmentation signature analysis
  • Fiber signature analysis
  • Defining the chemical interactions of the explosive’s materials
  • Defining the physical chemistry handling of the explosive’s materials
  • Preparing maps and diagrams
  • Detailing the process or handling procedures on balance with the actual events.
  • Assessing the environmental conditions
  • Assessing the human factors of all persons involved

If you need an expert opinion on explosives, turn to ExploConsult. We’ll analyze your case and any existing evidence and help you shed light on what happened and how your case can move forward. Get a comprehensive opinion report that will provide extra evidence for your case from our dedicated team.

View Select Explosives Expert Witness Cases
  • Juanita Secor (Plaintiff) v. Pyrotecico Fireworks, Inc., Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, Chicago White Sox, Ltd. (Defendant), in The Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois, Case No. 2025L009354 (Fireworks)
  • People of The State of Illinois (Plaintiff) v. Anthony J. Krieger (Defendant) in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Boone County, Illinois, Case No. 2024-CF-31 (Explosives Manufacturing and Possession of Explosives)
  • Joshua Persichetti (Plaintiff) v. Xtreme FX LLC, GC Osceola Conference Center, LLC, Omni Champions Gate, Resort Hotel LP, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America), Inc., Hello! Florida Destination Management, Inc. (Defendant), in The Circuit Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit, Osceola County, FL, Case No. 2024-CA-000566 (Explosives and Fireworks)
  • Zachary Ghowiba v. James Nash, Jan Nash and Eric Nash, In The Circuit Court of the 18th Judicial Circuit, Seminole County, FL, Case No. 2024-CA-000566 (Fireworks)
  • Khraila Yowell and Melissa Makowski, as next of kin of Donald Yowell, Jr. v. Accurate Energetic Systems LLC (“AES”) and AAC Investments LLC (Explosives Manufacturing)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: State of California (Plaintiff) v. Steve Faram (Defendant) in Superior Court of the State of California, for the county of Los Angeles, Case No. 25CJCFU4104 (Explosives and Destructive Device)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: MCR Oil Tools, LLC. (Plaintiff) v. Wireline Well Services Tunisia (Defendant), United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, 3:19-cv-02536 (Explosives Formulation)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: MCR Oil Tools, LLC. (Plaintiff) v. Wireline Well Services Tunisia (Defendant), Supreme Court of Cassation, The Republic of Tunisia, 76712- 2023 (Explosives Formulation)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: United States of America (Plaintiff) v. Daniel Ball (Defendant) United States District Court, Washington D.C., Case No. 1:23-MJ-00088 (Attempted Murder Improvised Explosives Device)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Nicholson, et al. (Plaintiff) v. Betty Bittner (Defendant) Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Ohio, Case No. CV: 2024-11-5226 (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Douglas Brownell (Plaintiff) v. Nine Pyro and Mystical Distributing Company Ltd. (Defendant) in Supreme Court of British Columbia. Action No. S217283 (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: State of Oregon (Plaintiff) v. Brandy Crenshaw (Defendant) in the Superior Court, State of Oregon, Case No. 24-CR-17216 (Improvised Explosives Device)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Timothy Olson (Plaintiff) v. Sunny International Co., LTD. Guangzhou/Shanghai (Defendant) in the Circuit Court of Taylor County, State of Wisconsin, Case No. 2021-CV-79 (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Ana Anaya (Plaintiff) v Los Angeles Police Department, et. al. (Defendant), Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No: 21STCV39748 (Explosives Disposal)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The King (Plaintiff) v. Sean Paul Farrell (Defendant) in The Crown Court Sitting at Belfast Crown Court, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Case No: ICOS 21/089293 (Attempted Murder - Explosives Improvised Device)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Morgan Leary (Plaintiff) v. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (Defendant) in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside, Palm Springs. Case No: CVPS2303941 (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: United States of America. (Plaintiff) v. Waylon Blake Gilreath (Defendant) in United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Case No. 2:24MJ55-SMD (Explosives)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: R.W., Minor. (Plaintiff) v. Darrow Ventures, Inc., D/B/A Four Seasons Fireworks and Paved 2 Perfection, LLC. (Defendant) in The Circuit Court of The Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County, Florida. Case No.:16-2023-Ca-010215 (Pyrotechnics)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF” Ana Anaya (Plaintiff) v Los Angeles Police Department, et. al. (Defendant), Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No: 21STCV39748
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Orica International PTE Ltd and Orica USA Inc & Nelson Brothers LLC (Plaintiffs) v. CF Industries Sales LLC & CF Industries Nitrogen LLC (Defendants), State of Illinois, CV 23 CH 00000197
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Todd R. Zdroik (Plaintiff) vs. Sunny International Co., LTD. Guangzhou/Shanghai (Defendant) in the Circuit Court of Villas County, State of Wisconsin, Case No. 19-CV-95 (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The Estate of Timothy L. Olson and Harp Industries, Inc. (Plaintiff) vs. Sunny International Co., LTD. Guangzhou/Shanghai (Defendant) in the Circuit Court of Villas County, State of Wisconsin, Case No. 19-CV-95 (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: San Bernardo County, a California public entity (Plaintiff) v. The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Defendant), United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, 5:21-CV-01978 PSG (Explosives Ordnance Forensic Investigation)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Stephen K. Molgard (Plaintiff) v. Strider Construction, Co. Inc. (Defendant), Superior Court of the State of Washington in a for King County: CV: 21-2-15077-9 SEA (Explosives)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Allison Hohn (Plaintiff) v. Red Rock Lodge (DEFENDANT), Luzerne County Court, State Court of Pennsylvania, (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Paige Torres (Plaintiff) v. Phantom Fireworks (DEFENDANT), State Court of Florida, CV: 50-2022-CA-002980-MB (Fireworks)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Isaac K. Kinzie (Plaintiff) v. AIS Construction: Access Limited Construction (DEFENDANT), et. al. in the 5th Circuit Court of the State of Hawaii, CV: 19-1-0123JR
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Maluc Cordoba-Arce; Tejada; Tejada; Tejada; Tejada (Plaintiffs) v. D. Construction, Inc; Jeff C. Gillan; Patrick L. Carney; and ORICA USA Inc. (Defendants) in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois County, Illinois No. 2021L009411
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The Queen (Plaintiff) v. Sean McVeigh (Defendant) in the Crown Court of Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Murder)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Darrick Gust and Emily Gust (Plaintiffs) v. Panthera Enterprises, LLC, F/K/A Tenx Group, LLC, Panthera Worldwide, LLC, Panthera Training Center, LLC, Historic Arms Corporation, and Wilmer C. Bahr (Defendants), In the Circuit Court of Hardy, West Virginia: CA 20C-19445 (Explosives Ordnance)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: United States (Plaintiff) v. Glenn Springhope, In the U.S. Court, Western District of North Carolina 1:19CR572-1 (Criminal Explosives Use)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: United States for the Use and Benefit of Rock Supremacy, LLC. (Plaintiff) v. S.E.A Construction, LLC and Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America (Defendant) In the U.S. Court, Western District of Washington at Seattle No. 2:18-cv-1698-JLR (Explosives Use)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: People of the State of California (Plaintiff) v. Justin Fisher (Defendant) In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Napa NSD19-002393 (Explosives)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: People of the State of California (Plaintiff) v. Bronson Kelly (Defendant) In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Placer 62-164811 (Explosives)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: City of Riverside, California v. Goodrich Corporation d/b/a B.F. Goodrich Company, et. al., (Defendants), Superior Court of the State of California, City of Los Angeles BC376008 (Ammonium Perchlorate)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Mariana Baldridge (Plaintiff) v. Spirit of ‘76 Fireworks, LLC., et. al., (Defendants), State of Texas, District Court, 413th Judicial District, Johnson County, Texas DC-C201600111 (Pyrotechnics)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: State of Louisiana, Military Department, Department of Public Safety, and State Police (Plaintiff) v. Crum And Forster Specialty Ins. Co., and Seneca Specialty Ins. Co. (Defendants), State of Louisiana, 26th Judicial District, Webster Parish, 73 438-F (Explosives)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Cranbury Brick Yard, LLC. (Plaintiff) v. United States of America, The United States Navy, The United States Department of the Army (Defendants), In the U.S. Court, District of New Jersey 15-02789 (PGS) (LHG) (Explosives Ordnance)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The State of Oregon (Plaintiff) v. Bruce Allan Turnidge (Defendant), State of Oregon, Supreme Court (Murder)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: James Michael Green (Plaintiff) v. Mag Instrument, Inc., Grady Whiddon and Pestmax Pest Control Services, LLC. (Defendants), State of Texas, 125th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas 2016-40830 (Propellant)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Takata Corporation and its subsidiaries, including TK Holdings, Inc. (Defendant) v. Patricia Mincey (Plaintiff), Circuit Court 4th District, Duval County, Florida, 15CA000377 (Automotive Airbags)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: La Vellar Mitchell individually and for the Estate of Maurice Mitchell, Deceased (Plaintiff) vs. Raytheon Company d/b/a Raytheon Missile Systems; and Lockheed Martin Corporation d/b/a Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (Defendant), United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, 1:11-1046-SOH (Missile Propellant)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The People of the State of California (Plaintiff) vs. Richard Fox (Richard Barrett) (Defendant) Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, SCE 319078 (Murder)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The Queen (Plaintiff) v. Benjamin Harris (Defendant), Old Bailey Central Criminal Court, London, England, UK (Pyrotechnics)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Wanda Ovalles, Individually and P.P.A. Ovalles and Wilson Ovalles (Plaintiff) v. Sony Electronics, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., FOXCONN International, Inc. (Defendants), United States District Court, District of Rhode Island, 14-137M (Propellant)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Johnny Barrett (Plaintiff) v. Pyrotechnics Specialties, Inc. & California Insurance Co. c/o Applied Risk Services (Defendant), U.S. Court, State of Georgia (Pyrotechnics)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: MAXAM (Plaintiff) v. Graham (Defendant), Australia Federal Court, Perth, Western Australia (Explosives)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Gavilan Peak Estates, LLC (Plaintiff) v. John J Flynn, American Security Investments, Wendy Berns, et. al. (Defendants), State of Arizona, Maricopa County, 2015-054086 (Explosives Ordnance)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Jennifer Plank-Greer (Plaintiff) vs. Big Bucks Firearms & Sporting Goods, Inc. (Defendant), United States District Court, for the Northern District of Ohio, Toledo Division 3:13-CV-01266 (Explosives)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: (Hammonds and Rodriguez (Plaintiff) v. United States of America, The United States Department of the Army (Defendants), In the U.S. Court, District of New Mexico (Explosives Ordnance)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: The City of Colorado Springs (Defendants) vs. Ronald J Brown (Plaintiff) U.S. Court, District of Colorado 14-CV-01471 (Explosives)
  • Expert for the PLAINTIFF: Rothschild, et al. (Plaintiff), v. U.S. Government (Defendant), United States District Court, Wyoming, 2:15-cv-00030-ABJ (Explosives)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Michael Medellin (Plaintiff), vs. Alliant Techsystems Inc. and Alberci Constructors, Inc. (Defendant), United States District Court, Western District of Missouri Western Division 4:11-cv-00654-SOW (Explosives Ordnance)
  • Expert for the DEFENDANT: Dyno Nobel, Inc. (Plaintiff), vs. Blue Point Capital Partners, L.P. (Defendant), State of New York, Supreme Court, 6600716 (Explosives & Detonators)

Our Contact Form

If you’d like to learn more about how ExploConsult can provide your law firm with explosive expert consulting, comprehensive reports, and explosives expert testimony, fill out our contact form. After we receive your message, we’ll review the particulars and reach out to you about our explosive expert legal consulting services and let you know how we can help.